After the U.S. Election: The Four R’s of Investing for Capital Preservation

After the U.S. Election: The Four R’s of Investing for Capital Preservation
author-image
PUBLISHED:
CATEGORIES: Viewpoints

After the U.S. Election: The Four R’s of Investing for Capital Preservation

From the SEC’s money market fund reform to the seismic shift from prime funds to government-only money market funds, change has been a constant for cash and short-term investors over the past few months.

Now, the comfortable climate of range-bound interest rates may also be a thing of the past: Firming economic data are expected to spur the Federal Reserve to raise the policy rate, likely in December, and the U.S. election results are increasing market volatility as investors try to figure out which path President-elect Donald Trump will take. The evaluation over the next several months of possible pro-growth initiatives, such as tax cuts and infrastructure spending, or the more populist route, which could include trade barriers and immigration reform, will certainly test investors’ mettle.

Through all of this, we have prescribed three antidotes to uncertainty for cash and short-term investors: Prepare for volatility associated with potential Fed moves, consider limiting money market fund exposure (as these funds may very well fail to protect purchasing power), and actively manage cash and short-term allocations in an effort to maximize returns.

Now that we have clarity on the U.S. election and seem to be on the precipice of a Fed hike, it is time to refresh the rules for investing for capital preservation. We call them the Four R’s.

Rising rates. With economic data continuing to improve and the clouds of political uncertainty beginning to part, we think the Fed’s conservative playing style will wane. PIMCO still expects terminal rates to remain lower than historical norms (what we call The New Neutral), but investors should expect the Fed to be more responsive to an improving jobs picture and higher inflation. As a result, we think investment allocations should be defensive in their interest rate exposure, potentially avoiding the front end of the yield curve, and we favor floating rate notes. We think actively managed fixed income strategies should outperform passive strategies in this environment, as they have more scope to dynamically increase and decrease their exposures in an effort to maximize returns and minimize volatility.

Reflation. With inflation indicators starting to edge upward, investors should prepare for increasing, although we believe historically modest, inflation. Given the low level of absolute rates, even small increases in inflation could have a significant impact on returns. It is paramount to focus on preserving capital not only in nominal terms, but also in real, or inflation-adjusted, terms. The minimal income from money market allocations currently can do little to protect purchasing power; this should become more apparent as money-fund yields remain structurally subdued, even as the Fed embarks on a route to higher rates.

Repatriation. With a Republican Congress and administration, investors can begin to prepare for a variety of expected outcomes. Fiscal stimulus is one, although the size remains in question. Another potential outcome is the repatriation of foreign profits by U.S. entities: Lower corporate tax rates would likely drive a flood of cash back into onshore investments and banks. This is a potential paradigm shift that would affect corporate leverage, issuance patterns and front-end rates, and we think investors should be poised to capitalize on it.

Regulation. Perhaps the most profound yet unexpected outcome of the U.S. election for financial markets will be the evolution of regulation. At the very least, the new Republican administration will likely reevaluate many of the regulatory measures implemented since the financial crisis. More likely, it will look to revise, redact or refuse to implement many, from Dodd-Frank to money market reform. With the recent resignation of SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White, President-elect Trump can appoint three (out of five) SEC commissioners, which could greatly alter the market and investment landscape for years to come.

Jerome Schneider is PIMCO’s head of short-term portfolio management and is a regular contributor to the PIMCO Blog.

SHARE THIS

PIMCO’s industry-renowned experts analyze the world’s risks and opportunities, from global economic trends to individual securities.

RECENT POSTS

By Month

Categories

Disclosures

All investments contain risk and may lose value. Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and the current low interest rate environment increases this risk. Current reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed. Short term investments are more volatile than money market funds. Floating rate loans are not traded on an exchange and are subject to significant credit, valuation and liquidity risk. Management risk is the risk that the investment techniques and risk analyses applied by an active manager will not produce the desired results, and that certain policies or developments may affect the investment techniques available to active manager in connection with managing the strategy. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are suitable for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest long-term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision.