The Global Bond Paradox: How Hedging Can Enhance Low Local Yields
Despite low bond yields in many countries outside the U.S., hedged yields may be quite attractive for U.S. dollar-based investors.
Japanese government bonds yield virtually zero. Yields on German bunds remain stuck below 50 basis points (bps). U.K. gilts yield only about 125 bps. Do non-U.S. bonds such as these hold any value to dollar-based investors?
Yes, quite a bit, it turns out.
For a dollar-based investor, hedging foreign currency exposure on lower-yielding global bonds may potentially result in higher yields than U.S. Treasuries. Essentially, investors are getting paid to hedge the currency risk back to the US dollar. Other potential benefits for those who invest internationally and hedge their U.S. currency exposure include improved diversification and defense against rising U.S. interest rates.
Why hedging may pay
Despite low bond yields in many countries outside the U.S., hedged yields may be quite attractive for U.S. dollar-based investors. The yield to maturity of hedged global bonds (as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index ex-USD (USD Hedged)) was 3.16% as of 30 June 2018 – nearly equal to the 3.27% for the main U.S. bond index (represented by the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index).
How is that possible? Hedging foreign currencies back to the U.S. dollar currently adds about 220 bps of carry because of favorable short-term interest rate differentials. In order to hedge currency exposure in a foreign bond, investors effectively pay the short-term rate in the foreign currency and receive the short-term rate in their home currency.
If short-term rates for U.S. dollars are higher than those for the target currency – as they are in many cases today – the cost of hedging may be negative; in other words, investors could get paid to hedge.
We expect this dynamic to continue over the cyclical (six- to 12-month) horizon as the Federal Reserve continues to raise rates while most other developed market central banks remain on hold.
Other potential benefits
The investment case for global bonds is not just about relative yields. Harry Markowitz, a Nobel laureate economist and the father of modern portfolio theory, called diversification “the only free lunch in finance” for its potential to reduce risk without sacrificing returns. Global bonds are a great example of the potential benefits of diversification.
Case in point: Global bond returns were positive in eight of the past 11 periods of increasing U.S. interest rates (see chart). In the first six months of this year, they delivered a positive return of about 1.4%, while the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index fell around 1.5%.
Because economic cycles and hence monetary policies are not in perfect alignment globally, diversification into global bonds may reduce portfolio volatility by giving investors exposure to countries with varying yield curves. In a way, because economic cycles vary across countries, there is a natural rotation of best- and worst-performing global bond markets. At times, this may allow global bonds to help dollar-based investors buffer their portfolios from the effects of rising U.S. interest rates.
Even during periods of stress, when correlations between U.S. and global bonds increase, global bond markets may not be perfectly correlated, so diversification potential remains.
In sum, we view global bond strategies like broccoli in your diet – if consumed regularly, they may deliver sustained benefits over time.
For more of our views on interest rates, see PIMCO’s Rise Above Rising Rates page.
READ HERE
Sachin Gupta is head of PIMCO’s global portfolio management desk. Olivia Albrecht is a strategist focused on global fixed income.