Third-Quarter Earnings Eased Market Fears, But Will the Reprieve Last?

Third-Quarter Earnings Eased Market Fears, But Will the Reprieve Last?
author-imageauthor-image
PUBLISHED:

Third‑Quarter Earnings Eased Market Fears, But Will the Reprieve Last?

Markets breathed a sigh of relief during third-quarter earnings season, with companies reporting better-than-expected (if mediocre) results that helped allay concerns about a profit recession, at least for now. Equity prices rallied in many cases despite middling results, and the S&P 500 posted one of its best returns during earnings season in the last five years.

Third-quarter earnings for S&P 500 companies slowed to less than a 3% pace (see chart), but this may have felt better considering the deterioration in macro growth sentiment. The ISM Manufacturing Index fell below 50 during the quarter, indicating a contraction, and the Conference Board’s CEO confidence reading dropped 9 points to 34 (with readings under 50 reflecting more negative than positive responses). And the results didn’t stop forecasters from lowering fourth-quarter growth expectations, which dropped to just below 0% from over +6% this summer.

The lower confidence readings and earnings estimates suggest that companies are appreciating the “window of weakness” PIMCO sees for the global economy and markets. The question is whether they are a signal that the business cycle may be turning – and how long the market reprieve will last.

A marked divergence between large and small cap equities

Signs of weakness are more acute for small cap equities, where trailing-12-month earnings have fallen by more than 15% – a notable divergence from their large cap peers, as the chart shows. Small cap companies are often more sensitive to cyclical economic growth, tend to operate with lower margins, and have less flexible business models. The dispersion in fundamentals created by cyclical companies and those more sensitive to trade developments have given rise to opportunities for active managers.

Trailing earnings growth has diverged between small cap and large cap companies chart

Credit market fundamentals look sound, but policy risk could create headwinds

In the credit markets, net leverage remains stable, and net upgrades from high yield to investment grade are estimated to reach a record high of $54 billion in rated debt this year (according to BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research). Consensus earnings sentiment remains optimistic, while CEO and CFO confidence measures have nose-dived. While some sell-side studies have suggested that lower CEO and CFO confidence could signal a further decline in capital expenditures, these indicators of sentiment tend to be volatile and could change quickly, especially given better news on trade recently.

According to a recent BofA investor survey, the 2020 election is still the primary concern, which suggests that the current impeachment process may create volatility in the market. While certain sectors have underperformed on the back of various policy headlines, election risk does not yet appear to be broadly reflected in the credit market and could be a headwind going forward.

Rich valuations offset strong technicals

On the other hand, technicals remain quite strong. The supply outlook looks favorable, given a light forward-looking M&A calendar (elevated volatility tends to damp M&A activity) along with an extension of the maturity profile, with various large cap companies having tendered short-dated debt and issued longer-dated debt. We’re also seeing elevated reverse Yankee bond issuance under the backdrop of supportive European Central Bank (ECB) monetary policy and favorable pricing (from the issuers’ perspective). Moreover, U.S. investment grade demand is likely to remain strong as investors continue to seek higher-quality fixed income investments with positive yields.

Yet strong technicals are counterbalanced by valuation concerns, with the overall beta looking less attractive than earlier in the year. However, elevated dispersion means that alpha opportunities still exist for active investors. 

Investor takeaways

Equity and credit markets have thus far taken lackluster earnings results and lower expectations in stride, but we think this could change if confidence readings drop further.

We’re watching the impact on cyclical companies and those more sensitive to trade disruptions, which have created dispersions in fundamentals and in turn led to opportunities for active managers.

While supply/demand technicals remain supportive for credit markets, current rich valuations and the potential for dispersion as companies prepare their balance sheets for slowing growth suggest that an active approach to credit selection will be critical.

See “Credit Versus Equities: Idiosyncratic Stories Call For a Thoughtful Approach” for more of our views on investing in risk assets.

Lillian Lin is a portfolio manager focused on investment grade credit, and Bill Smith is a portfolio manager focused on global equities. Both are contributors to the PIMCO Blog.

SHARE THIS

PIMCO’s industry-renowned experts analyze the world’s risks and opportunities, from global economic trends to individual securities.

RECENT POSTS

By Month

Categories

Disclosures

Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results.

Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and low interest rate environments increase this risk. Reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed. Equities may decline in value due to both real and perceived general market, economic and industry conditions. Investing in foreign-denominated and/or -domiciled securities may involve heightened risk due to currency fluctuations, and economic and political risks, which may be enhanced in emerging markets. Investing in securities of smaller companies tends to be more volatile and less liquid than investing in securities of larger companies. Derivatives may involve certain costs and risks, such as liquidity, interest rate, market, credit, management and the risk that a position could not be closed when most advantageous. Investing in derivatives could lose more than the amount invested.

The credit quality of a particular security or group of securities does not ensure the stability or safety of the overall portfolio. The terms “cheap” and “rich” as used herein generally refer to a security or asset class that is deemed to be substantially under- or overpriced compared to both its historical average as well as to the investment manager’s future expectations. There is no guarantee of future results or that a security’s valuation will ensure a profit or protect against a loss.

Forecasts, estimates and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision.